Timeline for Another take on Family Historians and Duplicates
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:54 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://genealogy.stackexchange.com/ with https://genealogy.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 6, 2013 at 9:50 | comment | added | user104 | @Fortiter Also, "less convinced" is not the same as "dogmatically insistent." Put a counterview? | |
| Feb 6, 2013 at 8:27 | comment | added | user104 | @Fortiter And when it's re-opened because the OP has clarified the differences in their circumstances? | |
| Feb 6, 2013 at 3:36 | comment | added | Fortiter | When you close that (hypothetical) question as a duplicate, you will be applying the SE rules perfectly, and ensuring that G&FH never reaches its potential. But pursuing that argument would merely duplicate points made elsewhere. | |
| Feb 5, 2013 at 15:20 | history | answered | user104 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |