Timeline for What should happen to a closed question that is re-asked?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:54 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://genealogy.stackexchange.com/ with https://genealogy.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 5, 2013 at 18:12 | history | edited | user104 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 82 characters in body
|
| May 5, 2013 at 15:04 | history | edited | user104 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 24 characters in body
|
| May 5, 2013 at 14:31 | answer | added | user104 | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 5, 2013 at 14:04 | comment | added | user104 | @Duncan, unfortunately duplicates are judged against current wording of Qs, not any previous iterations. Yes, perhaps it would have been better to ask the completely different question in the first place, but we're all still learning. | |
| May 4, 2013 at 22:35 | answer | added | Duncan | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 4, 2013 at 22:27 | comment | added | Duncan | The link you refer to isn't the original question. It's the modified question that the community did not reopen. I thought it was different enough from original question that I reasked (probably what I should have done the first time instead of editing since it seems impossible to get questions reopened and that isn't just a genealogy problem). | |
| May 4, 2013 at 19:44 | answer | added | jmort253 | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 4, 2013 at 17:56 | history | edited | user104 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| May 4, 2013 at 17:10 | history | edited | user104 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2013 at 16:48 | history | edited | user104 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 105 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2013 at 16:33 | history | edited | user104 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| May 4, 2013 at 16:17 | history | edited | user104 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 574 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2013 at 16:11 | history | asked | user104 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |