Timeline for Using family name (surname) tags?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2017 at 0:12 | history | edited | PolyGeoMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 54 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Oct 12, 2012 at 6:13 | comment | added | Canadian Girl Scout | No to family names! I can just imagine a clan of 'Jones' taking over the site and using it as their own personal communication hub. | |
| Oct 12, 2012 at 5:06 | vote | accept | Saariko | ||
| Oct 12, 2012 at 5:06 | vote | accept | Saariko | ||
| Oct 12, 2012 at 5:06 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2012 at 5:06 | vote | accept | Saariko | ||
| Oct 12, 2012 at 5:06 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2012 at 1:33 | answer | added | lkessler | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 12, 2012 at 1:04 | answer | added | Fortiter | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 8:58 | comment | added | Justin808 | This ties in with meta.genealogy.stackexchange.com/questions/3/… I think. If we aren't going to support specific person related questions family name tags are a no-no. If we are then perhaps they would be useful. | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 8:56 | answer | added | texnic | timeline score: 14 | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 8:33 | history | asked | Saariko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |