Timeline for Another take on Family Historians and Duplicates
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2013 at 17:52 | comment | added | ACProctor | OK. I'd go with that | |
| Feb 6, 2013 at 17:48 | comment | added | user104 | We only have flexibility in the FAQ on the first section. | |
| Feb 6, 2013 at 17:47 | comment | added | user104 | @GeneJ and I had a discussion on this at chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/7699151#7699151 I think (hey, I've only been on SE for less than 3 months) that the way to do it is "canonical questions" on the Main site (so that they're seen as part of the main content) rather than Qs tagged as faq on Meta. Which is the same things I suppose as your stock Qs, and no reason we can't start posting Qs that we answer ourselves? | |
| Feb 6, 2013 at 17:40 | comment | added | ACProctor | @ColeValleyGirl, What about a new FAQ area that covers common genealogical questions, as opposed to the existing FAQ that explains the site's rules and best-practices? | |
| Feb 5, 2013 at 15:22 | comment | added | user104 | Even though some of what we deal with is subjective, differing answers built upon differing experience have to be acceptable -- we don't have to find a single holy grail to answer every question. | |
| Feb 4, 2013 at 17:50 | history | answered | ACProctor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |