Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with decision
Search options not deleted
user 108
0
votes
Should we use century tags (like 20th-century) or alternative, typically numeric year-range ...
I believe you're both thinking in Gregorian terms here. If this site were specifically interested in, say, Hindu family history then it would be tagging time frames from an entirely different calendar …
- 5,907
1
vote
Should we use century tags (like 20th-century) or alternative, typically numeric year-range ...
For the specific case of Gregorian dates, the amiguities cannot be resolved using numerals alone. For instance, is 1900 a year, a decade, or a century?
However, using a wildcard character such as 'x' …
- 5,907